RESUMO
Advances in cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have prolonged life expectancy in various medical settings. However, the issue of hypersensitivity to components of CIEDs is still a concern. Since 1970, allergic reactions to metallic and nonmetallic components of CIEDs have been reported. Hypersensitivity reactions to medical devices are rare and not fully understood. In some cases, diagnosis and treatment are difficult. Cardiologists should always keep in mind pacemaker allergy when a patient appears with wound complications and no signs of infection. Patch testing should be tailored toward the specific biomaterials used in a device, in addition to testing with standard screening allergens in select cases.
RESUMO
Background: His bundle pacing (HBP) may be a challenging procedure, often involving a long fluoroscopic time (FT) and a long procedural time (PT). We sought to evaluate whether the use of a new nonfluroscopic mapping (NFM) system, the KODEX-EPD, is able to reduce FT and PT when mapping is performed by the pacing catheter rather than an electrophysiological mapping catheter. Methods and Results: We included 46 consecutive patients (77 ± 8 years; 63% male) who underwent HBP; in 22 a NFM-guided procedure with the KODEX-EPD system was performed (group 1), whereas in 24 a conventional fluoroscopy-guided approach was used (group 2). Pacing indications were sick sinus syndrome in 13, atrioventricular block in 21, and cardiac resynchronization therapy in 12 cases. Both a lumen-less fixed helix lead and a stylet-driven extendable helix lead were used, respectively, in 24% and 76% of patients. HBP was successful in 22 patients (100%) in group 1 and 23 patients (96%) in group 2. The FT was significantly reduced in group 1 (183 ± 117 s vs 464.1 ± 352 s in group 2, p = .012). There were no significant differences between groups in PT and other procedural outcomes. Conclusions: The KODEX-EPD system may be safely used in HBP procedures. It is effective in reducing ionizing radiation exposure, as evidenced by the significant drop in FT, without increasing PT.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is the established treatment for patients with symptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW). However, some patients undergo a challenging ablation or have recurrences during the early post-ablation phase. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical factors associated with an unsuccessful ablation outcome or repeated sessions. METHODS: Four hundred seventy-five symptomatic consecutive WPW patients (38.2±16.2 years old, 61% men, 69% with pre-excitation) who underwent an accessory pathway (AP) ablation from August 2005 to December 2015 were enrolled. When APs recurred, a redo ablation procedure was performed according to the patients' desire. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-nine patients (92.4%) were cured by ablation, but it failed in 36 (7.6%) after the first procedure. Seventeen patients had AP recurrences during the acute phase within 36h post-ablation. On the other hand, 4 were identified after more than one year. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, multiple, parahisian, and broad APs were significant independent predictors of recurrences after the 1st procedure, with odds ratios of 14.88 (p<0.001), 10.14 (p<0.001), and 6.88 (p<0.001), respectively. Finally, 468 patients (98.5%) received a successful ablation during a mean follow-up of 8.3±3.0 years. However, after the final procedure no significant predictors were recognized. Out of 508 total procedures, three major (0.6%) complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic WPW patients with multiple, parahisian, and broad APs had a significantly higher risk of recurrence. In half of the recurrence patients, AP recurrences were confirmed during the acute phase, but were rarely recorded in the very late phase.
